닫기

Ex) Article Title, Author, Keywords

Education Series

Split Viewer

Journal of Digestive Cancer Research 2024; 12(2): 141-143

Published online August 20, 2024

https://doi.org/10.52927/jdcr.2024.12.2.141

© Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Cancer Research

Immunotherapy in Advanced Biliary Tract Cancer


Seung Bae Yoon



Department of Internal Medicine, Eunpyeong St. Mary’s Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea

Correspondence to :
Seung Bae Yoon, E-mail: sbyoon@catholic.ac.kr, https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6119-7236

Received: July 11, 2024; Revised: August 2, 2024; Accepted: August 5, 2024

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0). which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

QUESTION: A 65-year-old female patient visited our hospital complaining of abdominal pain and dyspepsia. Abdominal computed tomography (CT) revealed a mass of approximately 6 cm in the left lobe of the liver (Fig. 1A). Percutaneous needle biopsy confirmed adenocarcinoma, and positron emission tomography-CT revealed peritoneal carcinomatosis (Fig. 1B). Therefore, the patient was diagnosed with stage IV intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma with peritoneal metastasis, and her performance status was good, indicating that palliative chemotherapy was an option. Considering the 2024 National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines, what are the two most recommended preferred regimens for first-line therapy for this patient?

Fig. 1.Initial imaging findings of the patient. (A) Abdominal computed tomography (CT). (B) Positron emission tomography-CT.

ANSWER: (1) Durvalumab + gemcitabine + cisplatin or (2) Pembrolizumab + gemcitabine + cisplatin.

REVIEW: Biliary tract cancer (BTC) is a malignant tumor originating from epithelial cells involved in bile production. The major types include extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, gallbladder cancer, and ampulla of Vater cancer. BTC predominantly affects the elderly and has a particularly high incidence in East Asia, including South Korea. The incidence of BTC is increasing in many countries, including Korea, and most patients present at an advanced stage at diagnosis, posing significant treatment challenges [1]. Currently, no effective screening tests for early detection of BTC have been established, and the disease often remains asymptomatic during the early stages, complicating early diagnosis. Consequently, the five-year survival rate remains alarmingly low at less than 10%.

Radical surgery offers the only curative treatment for BTC; however, operability is limited as most patients are diagnosed at an advanced stage. In these cases, chemotherapy becomes the primary treatment option. The standard regimen had been a combination of gemcitabine and cisplatin for more than a decade [2]. Nevertheless, the overall survival with this combination remains a mere 11.7 months. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) targeting the programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1)/programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) pathway have primarily been studied as a second-line treatment for patients who progress after first-line therapy [3,4]. Clinical trials have utilized pembrolizumab and nivolumab, showing therapeutic responses in some patients, although the increase in survival time has been minimal, and without a definitive biomarker, ICIs have not been established as a standard treatment.

The integration of ICI and cytotoxic chemotherapy combination therapy as first-line treatment has significantly altered the BTC treatment paradigm. The TOPAZ-1 study, published in 2022, demonstrated that the combination of the PD-L1 inhibitor durvalumab with gemcitabine and cisplatin improved survival rates in patients with advanced BTC compared to the previous standard therapy [5]. The 24-month overall survival rate was 24.9% for the durvalumab group versus 10.4% for the placebo group (hazard ratio, 0.80; 95% confidence interval, 0.66–0.97). The Keynote-966 study, published in 2023, showed similar results with the combination of the PD-1 inhibitor pembrolizumab with gemcitabine and cisplatin, demonstrating improved survival compared to standard therapy (hazard ratio, 0.83; 95% confidence interval, 0.72–0.95) [6]. These findings have led the recent NCCN guidelines to recommend gemcitabine/cisplatin/ICIs (durvalumab or pembrolizumab) combination therapy as first-line treatment for advanced BTC in patients with good performance status (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0 or 1). In Korea, as of April 2024, the use of gemcitabine/cisplatin/ICIs (durvalumab or pembrolizumab) is feasible for advanced BTC (excluding ampulla of Vater cancer), although the high cost of ICIs remains a barrier to widespread adoption.

Identifying effective biomarkers is essential for the successful application of ICIs in advanced BTC. While PD-L1 expression in tissue and microsatellite instability-high status are the primary biomarkers currently used, their efficacy has not been clearly established. A recent meta-analysis indicated that PD-L1 expression in tissue may predict improved survival following ICI therapy in BTC, but it does not predict response rates, limiting its role as a definitive biomarker [7]. Researches are expanding into other potential biomarkers, such as tumor mutational burden, which could enable more precise treatment selection and prognostic assessments.

The introduction of immunotherapy in the treatment of advanced BTC signifies a crucial advancement, and ongoing clinical trials and research are likely to provide further insights and treatment strategies. Future research should focus on optimal ICI combinations, effective patient selection criteria, and the management of adverse effects. Additionally, the development of biomarkers and a precision medicine approach will enhance personalized treatment strategies, improving survival rates and quality of life for BTC patients. These efforts are expected to open new horizons in the treatment of advanced BTC.

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

  1. Bertuccio P, Malvezzi M, Carioli G, et al. Global trends in mortality from intrahepatic and extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. J Hepatol 2019;71:104-114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhep.2019.03.013.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  2. Valle J, Wasan H, Palmer DH, et al; ABC-02 Trial Investigators. Cisplatin plus gemcitabine versus gemcitabine for biliary tract cancer. N Engl J Med 2010;362:1273-1281. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa0908721.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  3. Piha-Paul SA, Oh DY, Ueno M, et al. Efficacy and safety of pembrolizumab for the treatment of advanced biliary cancer: results from the KEYNOTE-158 and KEYNOTE-028 studies. Int J Cancer 2020;147:2190-2198. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.33013.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  4. Kim RD, Chung V, Alese OB, et al. A phase 2 multi-institutional study of nivolumab for patients with advanced refractory biliary tract cancer. JAMA Oncol 2020;6:888-894. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoncol.2020.0930.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  5. Oh DY, Ruth He A, Qin S, et al. Durvalumab plus gemcitabine and cisplatin in advanced biliary tract cancer. NEJM Evid 2022;1:EVIDoa2200015. https://doi/org/10.1056/EVIDoa2200015.
  6. Kelley RK, Ueno M, Yoo C, et al; KEYNOTE-966 Investigators. Pembrolizumab in combination with gemcitabine and cisplatin compared with gemcitabine and cisplatin alone for patients with advanced biliary tract cancer (KEYNOTE-966): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet 2023;401:1853-1865. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(23)00727-4.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  7. Yoon SB, Woo SM, Chun JW, et al. The predictive value of PD-L1 expression in response to anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy for biliary tract cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Immunol 2024;15:1321813. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2024.1321813.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef

Article

Education Series

Journal of Digestive Cancer Research 2024; 12(2): 141-143

Published online August 20, 2024 https://doi.org/10.52927/jdcr.2024.12.2.141

Copyright © Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Cancer Research.

Immunotherapy in Advanced Biliary Tract Cancer

Seung Bae Yoon

Department of Internal Medicine, Eunpyeong St. Mary’s Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea

Correspondence to:Seung Bae Yoon, E-mail: sbyoon@catholic.ac.kr, https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6119-7236

Received: July 11, 2024; Revised: August 2, 2024; Accepted: August 5, 2024

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0). which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Body

QUESTION: A 65-year-old female patient visited our hospital complaining of abdominal pain and dyspepsia. Abdominal computed tomography (CT) revealed a mass of approximately 6 cm in the left lobe of the liver (Fig. 1A). Percutaneous needle biopsy confirmed adenocarcinoma, and positron emission tomography-CT revealed peritoneal carcinomatosis (Fig. 1B). Therefore, the patient was diagnosed with stage IV intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma with peritoneal metastasis, and her performance status was good, indicating that palliative chemotherapy was an option. Considering the 2024 National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines, what are the two most recommended preferred regimens for first-line therapy for this patient?

Figure 1. Initial imaging findings of the patient. (A) Abdominal computed tomography (CT). (B) Positron emission tomography-CT.

ANSWER: (1) Durvalumab + gemcitabine + cisplatin or (2) Pembrolizumab + gemcitabine + cisplatin.

REVIEW: Biliary tract cancer (BTC) is a malignant tumor originating from epithelial cells involved in bile production. The major types include extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, gallbladder cancer, and ampulla of Vater cancer. BTC predominantly affects the elderly and has a particularly high incidence in East Asia, including South Korea. The incidence of BTC is increasing in many countries, including Korea, and most patients present at an advanced stage at diagnosis, posing significant treatment challenges [1]. Currently, no effective screening tests for early detection of BTC have been established, and the disease often remains asymptomatic during the early stages, complicating early diagnosis. Consequently, the five-year survival rate remains alarmingly low at less than 10%.

Radical surgery offers the only curative treatment for BTC; however, operability is limited as most patients are diagnosed at an advanced stage. In these cases, chemotherapy becomes the primary treatment option. The standard regimen had been a combination of gemcitabine and cisplatin for more than a decade [2]. Nevertheless, the overall survival with this combination remains a mere 11.7 months. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) targeting the programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1)/programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) pathway have primarily been studied as a second-line treatment for patients who progress after first-line therapy [3,4]. Clinical trials have utilized pembrolizumab and nivolumab, showing therapeutic responses in some patients, although the increase in survival time has been minimal, and without a definitive biomarker, ICIs have not been established as a standard treatment.

The integration of ICI and cytotoxic chemotherapy combination therapy as first-line treatment has significantly altered the BTC treatment paradigm. The TOPAZ-1 study, published in 2022, demonstrated that the combination of the PD-L1 inhibitor durvalumab with gemcitabine and cisplatin improved survival rates in patients with advanced BTC compared to the previous standard therapy [5]. The 24-month overall survival rate was 24.9% for the durvalumab group versus 10.4% for the placebo group (hazard ratio, 0.80; 95% confidence interval, 0.66–0.97). The Keynote-966 study, published in 2023, showed similar results with the combination of the PD-1 inhibitor pembrolizumab with gemcitabine and cisplatin, demonstrating improved survival compared to standard therapy (hazard ratio, 0.83; 95% confidence interval, 0.72–0.95) [6]. These findings have led the recent NCCN guidelines to recommend gemcitabine/cisplatin/ICIs (durvalumab or pembrolizumab) combination therapy as first-line treatment for advanced BTC in patients with good performance status (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0 or 1). In Korea, as of April 2024, the use of gemcitabine/cisplatin/ICIs (durvalumab or pembrolizumab) is feasible for advanced BTC (excluding ampulla of Vater cancer), although the high cost of ICIs remains a barrier to widespread adoption.

Identifying effective biomarkers is essential for the successful application of ICIs in advanced BTC. While PD-L1 expression in tissue and microsatellite instability-high status are the primary biomarkers currently used, their efficacy has not been clearly established. A recent meta-analysis indicated that PD-L1 expression in tissue may predict improved survival following ICI therapy in BTC, but it does not predict response rates, limiting its role as a definitive biomarker [7]. Researches are expanding into other potential biomarkers, such as tumor mutational burden, which could enable more precise treatment selection and prognostic assessments.

The introduction of immunotherapy in the treatment of advanced BTC signifies a crucial advancement, and ongoing clinical trials and research are likely to provide further insights and treatment strategies. Future research should focus on optimal ICI combinations, effective patient selection criteria, and the management of adverse effects. Additionally, the development of biomarkers and a precision medicine approach will enhance personalized treatment strategies, improving survival rates and quality of life for BTC patients. These efforts are expected to open new horizons in the treatment of advanced BTC.

FUNDING

None.

CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

Fig 1.

Figure 1.Initial imaging findings of the patient. (A) Abdominal computed tomography (CT). (B) Positron emission tomography-CT.
Journal of Digestive Cancer Research 2024; 12: 141-143https://doi.org/10.52927/jdcr.2024.12.2.141

References

  1. Bertuccio P, Malvezzi M, Carioli G, et al. Global trends in mortality from intrahepatic and extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. J Hepatol 2019;71:104-114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhep.2019.03.013.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  2. Valle J, Wasan H, Palmer DH, et al; ABC-02 Trial Investigators. Cisplatin plus gemcitabine versus gemcitabine for biliary tract cancer. N Engl J Med 2010;362:1273-1281. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa0908721.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  3. Piha-Paul SA, Oh DY, Ueno M, et al. Efficacy and safety of pembrolizumab for the treatment of advanced biliary cancer: results from the KEYNOTE-158 and KEYNOTE-028 studies. Int J Cancer 2020;147:2190-2198. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.33013.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  4. Kim RD, Chung V, Alese OB, et al. A phase 2 multi-institutional study of nivolumab for patients with advanced refractory biliary tract cancer. JAMA Oncol 2020;6:888-894. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoncol.2020.0930.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  5. Oh DY, Ruth He A, Qin S, et al. Durvalumab plus gemcitabine and cisplatin in advanced biliary tract cancer. NEJM Evid 2022;1:EVIDoa2200015. https://doi/org/10.1056/EVIDoa2200015.
  6. Kelley RK, Ueno M, Yoo C, et al; KEYNOTE-966 Investigators. Pembrolizumab in combination with gemcitabine and cisplatin compared with gemcitabine and cisplatin alone for patients with advanced biliary tract cancer (KEYNOTE-966): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet 2023;401:1853-1865. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(23)00727-4.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  7. Yoon SB, Woo SM, Chun JW, et al. The predictive value of PD-L1 expression in response to anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy for biliary tract cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Immunol 2024;15:1321813. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2024.1321813.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef

Journal Info

JDCR
Vol.12 No.2
August 20, 2024
eISSN : 2950-9505
pISSN : 2950-9394
Frequency: Triannual

open access

Article Tools

Stats or Metrics

Share this article on

  • line

Journal of Digestive Cancer Research

eISSN 2950-9505
pISSN 2950-9394

  • 2021
  • 2022
  • 2023
  • 2024